
| I\'m 33. |
I\'ve been waiting for these to become wearable since HAs were added to the site:
![]() Irion Slippers Someone said there are no more items that really should be wearable that aren\'t? I present the Irion Slippers. These are literally the only slippers that aren\'t wearable and... well... they\'re slippers. Slippers should be wearable. I don\'t know if I\'d even wear them, but having non-wearable slippers is just silly. |
| Yes, I\'ve had the same disappearing clothes problems. I\'ve just had it over the last day or so. It was never a problem for me before that. |
| Two new comments. One, in my browser (FF3) I sometimes find that if I put an item on, take it off, and then try to put it on again, I can\'t put it on until I load a new page of items and then return to the first page. Two, the funky corsets haven\'t been updated in the recode wardrobe. Can we have the new funky corsets? I\'m excited to try them! I lied, a third comment. If you\'re ever looking for slick new features to add, how about a link we can click that causes the item automatically pop up in shop search in a new tab (the way there is on the wishlist). Then when we\'re using the "All clothes on Subeta" feature (great feature, BTW) we would have a quick way to go buy things we find that we want. All and all, I love the new wardrobe. Great work! Once the ability to set the number of items on a page goes live I\'ll be a happy camper. :-) |
| Very cool. My one gripe: I really, really don\'t like having my clothes load on so many pages. Could there be some sort of option to increase the number of clothes that show per page, or a "view all" option? Other than that, it\'s awesome. I love the multiple saves, being able to search my wardrobe, being able to play with my hair, and the fact that I can scroll through the page while my HA stays visible. |
| My biggest suggestions: A way to remove items from the layer list Displaying the name of the item in the layer list A search feature as in SubetaHQ A separate scroll box for wardrobe items so that my HA is always displayed on the screen. I don\'t want to have to incessantly scroll back and forth to add items and see how they look. If I could only pick one of these four features, it would be the last one. |
| I\'m another 11-letter username, if you end up rotating them. :-) |
| WRONG LAYER ALERT! Item Name: Starlight Circlet Current Layer: Hat Correct Layer: ? WRONG LAYER ALERT! Item Name: Symphoni Nacht Ascension Angels Tear Circlet Current Layer: Head Correct Layer: ? I\'m not really sure where these should go... head, hat, or face (sort of seems like head to me... I mean, yes, it covers part of the face, but you put it ON your head) but as they\'re both called circlet and both go in the exact same spot on the HA, I\'m thinking they should be on the same layer. |
Quote By Luxe:You guys have yet to give me a reason why we should move dresses to their own layer though. If it\\\'s just to make the layers prettier to look at, I\\\'m going to have to say that\\\'s not good enough.For the same reason anything got moved... Because it would make more sense, and because it would make things easier to find. I mean, if the distinction between shoes and socks, between hats and headbands, or between things tht you wear on your hands and things you hold in your hands is important enough to justify multiple layers, why isn\'t the distinction between dresses/robes (which cover the whole body) and blouses and bras (that only cover only from the waist up) -- which is actually a really big difference. Right now we have layers broken into "chest" which by definition means above the waist, and "bottoms" which be definition means below the waist. Having something that goes both above and below the waist in either of those categories is just weird. Dresses fit just as well into the "bottoms" category as into "chest." I would argue that they fit better into the "bottom" category, in fact. I use dresses as skirts in my wardrobe (adding a chest item to cover the top) a lot more than I use them as tops. Practically speaking, my chest layer is by far the one with the most items, and I\'m guessing I\'m not the only one. I often seem to go through this whole little procedure where I have to carefully scrutinize the items on the chest layer one by one hunting for the item I\'m looking for, and I don\'t even have an especially big wardrobe. I understand the argument that all the layers will get really full eventually, but that doesn\'t mean spreading out the items more is a bad idea. (On the contrary, I think it makes it more important to keep some categories from getting bigger a lot faster than others.) Also, there\'s the layering issue: As I mentioned, I often use dresses as a skirt -- sometimes two dresses to make a double-layered skirt -- and then layer bodices or blouses over them. I\'m guessing I\'m not the only one. I think with all the dresses in chest it will be really easy to hit the layering limit even with a GA and of course lots of stuff would be impossible without a GA. |
| I\'ll put in another vote for a separate layer for dresses, kimonos, bodysuits, that sort of thing. I mean, yes, they go on your chest, but they cover the rest of the body, too, whereas "chest" really seems to imply things that just cover the chest. Perhaps the rule could be, if you can wear it without bottoms without being indecent, it\'s on whatever layer the dresses go on ("onepiece"? "dress"?) If it\'s meant to be worn with something else on the bottom (like pants or a skirt) it\'s "chest". |
| This strikes me as a really bad idea. Sure, the sP seems nice at first blush, but I\'m concerned it\'s going to cause tons of inflation. Stuff is expensive enough as it is. |
| That\'s neat! What is that you\'re wearing on the bottom? |
| So, is the annoying advertising bar going to go away pretty soon of its own accord? |
| About how much am I looking at for an r91 plushie? It's a Dawn Feli Plushie. |
| As the subject says. I'm curious if the necklace is still stocking (ie, I can wait for the price to drop to buy) or if it's stopped until next Halloween (ie, buy now). |
| And a few other assorted things, but those are the biggies. I'm willing to go lower than the lowest trade price (at least, reasonably so). I may take certain wishlist items, but for the most part I need the sP. :-)
The reason I need the sP, by the way, is that I'm busily saving for a Mystical Plushie. If you have either of the two Mystical Plushies and are looking for Murder of Crows or Riptide, drop me an sMail or a comment -- I can make up any price difference in pure. :-)
Link to Selling Riptide, Murder of Crows, want Mystical Plushie |
| This is what I'm going with for the moment. Always looking for a way to wear my owls. |
| Always. Except I don't have bangs and I do wear glasses. (I don't like any of the glasses on Subeta). My hair isn't *quite* as long as the one in my av, but it's pretty long (past my rear). |
| I'm personally quite tickled by the fact that my Doom Dragon looks like it's being produced by my Amulet of Life. (And quite grateful I already had the amulet before it became wearable.) |
| Thanks for the suggestions. (Dang it, the dress WAS over the staff. I wonder what happened.) I'll mess around with it a bit more. :-) |
